Individual skill
ndss-author-response
Use when writing an NDSS rebuttal and working the interactive discussion phase — triaging Round-2 reviews under a short window, answering adaptive-attack and ethics objections with pointable evidence, and negotiating toward Accept or a well-scoped Minor/Major Revision.
NDSS-Skills/skills/ndss-author-response/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,404
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- writing Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 5,397 bytes
Read excerpt
# NDSS Author Response
Reaching the rebuttal at NDSS already means something: the early reject did not take you,
and the paper is in Round 2 with reviewers who will *talk back* — the 2027 process pairs
the written response with an interactive discussion phase (fall window: October 8-10,
2026). Plan for a conversation, not a single volley.
## Triage first (day one of the window)
Sort every review point into four buckets before writing a sentence:
| Bucket | Test | Response strategy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Misreading | The paper already answers it | Quote section/figure; ask implicitly "what would make this clearer?" |