Individual skill

iclr-author-response

Use when drafting ICLR OpenReview author discussion replies, revision notes, public comments, restricted comments, and responses to reviewer or AC concerns during the discussion period. Use when reviews land and you must decide what to answer publicly versus privately, how to log a discussion-period revision, or how to move a borderline score before the AC writes the meta-review for the permanent record.

ICLR-Skills/skills/iclr-author-response/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,405
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# ICLR Author Response

Use this after ICLR reviews arrive. ICLR discussion is not just a static rebuttal: authors can
answer reviewers, clarify misunderstandings, make visible revisions when allowed, and help the AC
evaluate whether concerns are resolved.

## Response strategy

- Separate public comments from restricted comments to reviewers, ACs, or PCs according to the
  current OpenReview permissions.
- Lead with decision-relevant points: correctness, novelty, empirical adequacy, clarity,
  reproducibility, ethics, and community value.
- When uploading a revision during discussion, summarize the exact changes and give a compact diff
  map. Do not assume reviewers or ACs will re-read the full PDF.
Back to top