Menu

Individual skill

arecon-workflow

0upvotes

Use when deciding which arecon-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing an invited review article from topic through revision for an Annual Review of Economics (ARE) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-workflow/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,409
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# ARE Workflow Router (arecon-workflow)

## Overview

This is the router. It tells you **which arecon-* skill to use at the current stage** of an **invited review article** aimed at the *Annual Review of Economics* (ARE) — the **Annual Reviews** (nonprofit) survey series for economics, founded **2009**, published as an **annual volume** with a high impact factor (检索于 2026-06；11.4 in 2024, ~5th of 617 econ journals；以官网为准). ARE does **not** publish original empirical research. It publishes **authoritative, accessible review articles** that synthesize a field for specialists and adjacent economists. So the lifecycle is not "design → identify → estimate → defend"; it is **scope a synthesis-worthy field → secure the invitation → read the whole literature → impose an organizing framework → appraise the evidence fairly → land the ARE voice → clear the Annual Reviews production process → revise.**

Default assumption: unless the user says otherwise, treat the target as ARE and the artefact as an **invited review**, not a primary-research paper. Operational tells that you are at ARE and not a sibling: the work **reviews other people's results** rather than reporting its own; **unsolicited manuscripts are not accepted** — the **Editorial Committee commissions** topics and authors (you can suggest a topic, but you cannot self-submit a finished paper the way you would to a journal) (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准); there is **no identification strategy and no replication package of your own data** (you appraise the studies you cover); the contribution is an **analytical map of a field**, not a new estimate. If the user actually has original results, they want a primary-research journal (AER, QE, an AEJ), not ARE — say so.

## When to trigger

- The user asks "what should I do next?" on an invited review
- A review draft reads like an annotated bibliography and needs a spine
- Work is ping-ponging between coverage, framing, balance, and the invitation pitch
- An ARE editor/referee letter arrived and the user needs to switch into revision mode
Back to top