Individual skill

physics-reports

Use when targeting Physics Reports (Phys Rep) or deciding whether a long, comprehensive invited review across any area of physics fits this Elsevier review journal (Physics Letters C heritage). Encodes the journal's fit, framing, evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

English-NaturalScience-Journal-Skills/skills/physics-reports/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,405
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Physics Reports (physics-reports)

## Journal positioning

Physics Reports is Elsevier's review journal, originating as Physics Letters C, that publishes long, comprehensive review articles across the full breadth of physics. Its defining character is monograph-scale depth: a Physics Reports article is intended to become the standard reference on its topic, exhaustively surveying the theory, methods, results, and open problems of an active field. Reviews are typically invited but the journal also considers proposals, and the expected length is far beyond a normal journal article — often dozens to over a hundred pages. The currency is completeness, pedagogical clarity for working physicists, and lasting reference value, not brevity. Readership is the specialist and graduate-student community of the relevant subfield plus physicists entering it. This skill is a **fit / venue-selection / re-framing** tool. It does not replace the journal's current official submission guidelines. Before proposing or submitting, re-check the live author instructions on the Physics Reports Elsevier site.

## When to trigger

- The author is considering a comprehensive, monograph-length review of a physics field for Physics Reports.
- A leading group wants to consolidate a mature or rapidly maturing subfield into a definitive reference work.
- An author is choosing between Physics Reports, Reviews of Modern Physics, and Nature Reviews Physics for a long authoritative review.
- The author needs Physics Reports' depth and length expectations, proposal/invitation process, and desk-reject criteria before drafting.

## Scope & topic fit
Back to top