Individual skill

jams-writing-style

Use when shaping the prose, abstract, and introduction of a Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) manuscript so the dual theory-and-managerial contribution lands in the journal's voice. Polishes exposition; it does not state the contribution (jams-contribution-framing) or run the submission preflight (jams-submission).

Journal-of-the-Academy-of-Marketing-Science-Skills/skills/jams-writing-style/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,405
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Writing Style (jams-writing-style)

## When to trigger

- The introduction buries the idea, or opens with literature instead of the phenomenon
- The abstract reads like a method summary with no contribution or managerial payoff
- A reviewer says the paper is "hard to follow" or "the contribution is unclear"
- The discussion section lists implications generically with no decision attached
- This is late-stage polish — theory, design, and the takeaway are already settled

## The JAMS voice: rigorous, but legible to a manager

JAMS prose carries strong method while staying readable to a marketing academic *and* a thoughtful practitioner. The register is precise but not opaque — jargon and notation earn their place only when they sharpen the argument. The journal's identity is the **bridge between marketing science and marketing practice**, and the writing has to keep both readers in the room. Write so a CMO could follow the implications and a methodologist could trust the rigor.
Back to top