Individual skill

cvpr-review-process

Use when reasoning about how CVPR review actually works at 16,000-submission scale, covering the OpenReview pipeline and timeline, reviewer-duty enforcement and desk rejects, the reviewer LLM ban, AC and discussion dynamics, oral/highlight/poster decision tiers, and calibrating expectations to a ~25% acceptance rate.

CVPR-Skills/skills/cvpr-review-process/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,403
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# CVPR Review Process

Use this to model what happens to a CVPR paper between upload and decision, and where
author leverage exists. Every mechanism below is the 2026 cycle as verified 2026-07-08;
scale numbers come from official CVPR program announcements.

## The machine, by the numbers

The 2026 cycle put 16,092 submissions through full review (withdrawals and desk rejects
excluded from that count) and accepted 4,090 — 25.42%. Doing that required roughly
doubling the reviewer pool to 25,149 reviewers across 97 countries, coordinated by 909
area chairs. Two consequences follow for authors:

- Your reviewers are statistically likely to include first-time CVPR reviewers (the
Back to top