Individual skill
aaag-review-process
Use when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by area, 1-3 referees (one being the editor or designate), decision categories, and what desk-rejects a paper. Sets expectations; it does not write the paper or the response letter.
Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-review-process/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,391
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- operations Derived category
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 5,466 bytes
Read excerpt
# Review Process (aaag-review-process)
Knowing how the Annals judges a paper lets you pre-empt the objections that sink it. Submissions are
routed to a **subject editor by area**, reviewed **double-anonymously**, and held to the broad
four-area flagship's bar. Confirm volatile specifics on the official pages (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
## When to trigger
- Before submission, to stress-test against likely reviewer and editor objections
- Choosing the area so the right subject editor and reviewers handle the paper
- Interpreting a decision letter before drafting a response (`aaag-rebuttal`)
## How the Annals reviews (verify current wording)
