Individual skill

kdd-review-process

Use when reasoning about how KDD papers get judged in its dual-cycle OpenReview process: per-review rebuttal, area-chair recommendations weighed on merit through reproducibility and ethics, PC-chair decisions, the Resubmit outcome feeding the next cycle, the mixed academic-industry reviewer pool, and generative-AI review rules.

KDD-Skills/skills/kdd-review-process/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD: Yes
Scanner rules are current: No
Repository scan complete: No
Skill scan complete: Yes
Observed behavior: Not checked yet
Last checked: Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings): 1,409
Repository last updated: Sep 27, 2026
License: MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

academic-writing Repository topic
agent-skills Repository topic
journal Repository topic
academic-research Repository topic
ai-agents Repository topic
anthropic Repository topic
awesome-list Repository topic
claude Repository topic
claude-code Repository topic
economics Repository topic
research Derived category

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files

SKILL.mdcore · 6,654 bytes

Read excerpt


# KDD Review Process

Use this to model decisions rather than guess at them. KDD review runs on OpenReview,
per track and per cycle (the venue groups are literally named by track x cycle, e.g.
`Research_Track_Cycle_2`). Reconfirm the current cycle's mechanics before relying on
any stage detail — KDD tunes its process between cycles, not just between years.

## Decision machinery

- **Reviewers** score against the CFP's stated factors: technical merit, originality,
  potential impact, quality of execution, quality of presentation, related work,
  reproducibility of results, and ethics.
- **Authors** respond to each review in the rebuttal window — text only, no
  hyperlinks.