Individual skill
edbt-artifact-evaluation
Use when preparing an EDBT database-systems artifact and reproducibility package, covering what evaluators check first for systems papers, a turnkey run path, pinned workloads and environments, DOI-issuing archival for the open-access OpenProceedings record, and the higher stakes for Experiments & Analysis papers.
EDBT-Skills/skills/edbt-artifact-evaluation/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,403
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- data Derived category
- data-databases Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 5,072 bytes
Read excerpt
# EDBT Artifact Evaluation
Use this for the artifact and reproducibility package. EDBT's community values re-runnable
database-systems work, and the published record is **open access on OpenProceedings**, so a clean,
archived package strengthens the paper and its permanent citation. Two things to internalize: an
artifact is judged by an evaluator actually *running* it, and the review-time package (possibly
anonymized) is not the same deliverable as the permanent, DOI-archived package cited at
camera-ready.
> **待核实:** whether the current EDBT cycle runs a formal artifact-evaluation track, offers a
> reproducibility badge, and makes it optional or required is decided per edition — confirm on the
> current host-site call. The engineering below applies regardless of whether a badge is on offer.
## What evaluators open first (database-systems flavor)