Individual skill

journal-of-linguistics

Use when targeting Journal of Linguistics (Cambridge University Press, for the Linguistics Association of Great Britain) or deciding whether a general theoretical-linguistics manuscript fits this framework-neutral venue. Encodes the journal's broad fit, the argument-and-data bar, framework-neutrality, house style, glossing and double-blind norms, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

English-Humanities-Journal-Skills/skills/journal-of-linguistics/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,411
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Journal of Linguistics (journal-of-linguistics)

## Journal positioning

Journal of Linguistics, published by Cambridge University Press for the Linguistics
Association of Great Britain, is a general theoretical-linguistics venue that is
deliberately **framework-neutral** and open across subfields — phonology, morphology,
syntax, semantics, pragmatics, historical linguistics, and the philosophy and
methodology of the field. Its defining expectation is a **well-argued theoretical
contribution intelligible to linguists of different persuasions**: a clear problem, a
careful analysis, and a result whose interest does not depend on prior commitment to one
formalism. A narrowly framework-internal exercise, or a purely descriptive report with
no theoretical pay-off, is a poor fit. This skill is a **fit / venue-selection /
re-framing** aid. It does not replace the journal's current submission guidelines. Before
Back to top