Individual skill
cie-institutional-background
Use when the policy / institutional background section of a 《中国工业经济》 (China Industrial Economics) manuscript needs accurate detail — exact document names, effective dates, pilot batches and city lists, and the assignment rule that justifies the quasi-experiment. Sloppy policy detail is a frequent desk-reject trigger here.
China-Industrial-Economics-Skills/skills/cie-institutional-background/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,394
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 5,750 bytes
Read excerpt
# 制度背景(cie-institutional-background)
## 触发时机
- 制度背景段只说"近年来国家高度重视…",无文件、无时点
- DID 的处理组/时点说不清来源
- 试点是分批的,但稿子当成一次性冲击
- 审稿人质疑"政策是否外生 / 是否被预期"
## 为什么本刊特别看重这一段
本刊实证工程化,**识别的合法性几乎全押在制度细节上**。处理时点、处理对象、分配规则讲不准,后面所有 DID / event-study 都站不住。这也是高频拒稿/退修点。
## 必须讲准的要素