Individual skill

wp-theory-building

Use when building the theoretical argument of a World Politics manuscript so it travels across cases. World Politics rewards arguments that significantly advance theoretical debates in comparative politics and international relations, with explicit mechanisms and scope conditions that generalize beyond one case. Structures the argument; it does not run analyses.

World-Politics-Skills/skills/wp-theory-building/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,392
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Theory & Argument Building (wp-theory-building)

At World Politics a finding is not a contribution until it is attached to **theory the field can carry
to other cases.** The journal asks articles to "significantly advance theoretical debates" — so this
skill turns case evidence into a portable argument: explicit mechanisms, scope conditions, and
observable implications that hold across comparative or IR settings.

## When to trigger

- The empirics are strong but the "so what / why it travels" is thin
- A reviewer said the paper is "atheoretical," "ad hoc," or "just a single-case story"
- You need to state mechanisms, assumptions, and scope conditions explicitly
- Formal modeling: deciding what to model for a comparative/IR puzzle
Back to top