Individual skill
hlr-thesis-and-contribution
Use when articulating the central legal claim and normative payoff of a Harvard Law Review (HLR) piece so it reads as an original contribution, not a doctrinal survey. Forges the thesis; it does not search for preemption (hlr-preemption-check) or build the argument's internal structure (hlr-argument-structure).
Harvard-Law-Review-Skills/skills/hlr-thesis-and-contribution/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,411
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- legal Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 4,595 bytes
Read excerpt
# Thesis and Contribution (hlr-thesis-and-contribution)
In a student-edited generalist review, the single most decisive question is: **what is the claim, and
why does it matter?** HLR editors screen for a thesis that is **original, normative, and consequential**.
A piece that competently describes the state of the law without arguing for something will not clear the
screen. This skill turns a topic into a sharp, defensible claim with a stated payoff.
## When to trigger
- You can describe an area of law but cannot state your claim in one sentence
- A reader asks "so what?" after your introduction
- Reviewers (or your own gut) say the piece is "descriptive" or "a survey"
- You need to distinguish your contribution from the closest existing scholarship
