Individual skill

facct-author-response

Use when drafting ACM FAccT author responses — the short factual-correction rebuttal after preliminary reviews, and, distinctively for the 2026-new process, the Revise-and-resubmit round where you address Area-Chair-prioritized concerns from a mixed CS+law+social-science panel, map each to a concrete change, and survive a re-review while keeping mutual anonymity.

FAccT-Skills/skills/facct-author-response/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,397
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# FAccT Author Response

Use this after FAccT reviews are released. FAccT has **two distinct speaking turns**, and conflating
them is a common mistake: a **short rebuttal** for factual corrections, and — if you receive a
**Revise** decision (new for the 2026 edition) — a full **revision plus response** that addresses
Area-Chair-prioritized concerns and is **re-reviewed**. Both must respect mutual anonymity: nothing
you write may reveal authors, institutions, field sites, or a repository owner.

## Triage (both turns)

- Answer what affects the decision: relevance and framing, correctness, depth of exposition, honest
  treatment of strengths **and** limitations, and — often decisive at FAccT — the reality of the
  harm and the care taken with affected people.
- Answer **each reviewer on the axis they raised**, including the out-of-field reviewer. A legal or
Back to top