Individual skill
psychbull-inclusion-and-coding
Use when defining eligibility criteria and coding studies for a Psychological Bulletin review or meta-analysis — inclusion/exclusion rules, a codebook, double-coding, and inter-rater reliability. Governs how studies enter and are coded; effect-size modeling lives in psychbull-meta-analysis-methods.
Psychological-Bulletin-Skills/skills/psychbull-inclusion-and-coding/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,405
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 5,942 bytes
Read excerpt
# Inclusion & Coding (psychbull-inclusion-and-coding)
The credibility of a synthesis rests on **transparent, pre-specified eligibility** and **reliable
coding**. Decisions about which studies are in — and how their features are coded — must be
reproducible and made by **at least two trained coders** with documented agreement. This skill governs
eligibility and coding; the statistical model lives in `psychbull-meta-analysis-methods`.
## When to trigger
- Writing eligibility (inclusion/exclusion) criteria before full-text screening
- Building the **codebook** for study features, moderators, and effect-size inputs
- Setting up **double-coding** and computing **inter-rater reliability**
- A reviewer questions selection or coding decisions
