Individual skill

pom-rebuttal

Use when drafting the revision and point-by-point response after a Production and Operations Management (POM) revise-and-resubmit — addressing the Department Editor and referees, splitting changes between the main paper and the e-companion, and respecting the 32-page cap. Drafts the response after revisions; it does not interpret the decision letter (pom-review-process).

Production-and-Operations-Management-Skills/skills/pom-rebuttal/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,404
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# R&R Response & Rebuttal (pom-rebuttal)

## When to trigger

- You received a POM R&R and have planned (or made) the revision
- You must reconcile conflicting referee demands for the Department Editor
- A later-round decision asks you to defend or further revise prior changes

> Write the response letter **after** revising the manuscript, not before. Resubmit through ScholarOne (mc.manuscriptcentral.com/poms) to the **same Department Editor** where possible, and keep the revised main document within the **32-page** cap — push heavy new material into the unlimited online **e-companion**.

## Response-document structure

1. **Opening letter to the Department Editor.** Thank the editor and referees; summarize the most important changes in 2–4 sentences; state explicitly how you addressed the editor's stated priorities, including any practice-relevance concern. Note where referees conflicted and how you resolved it.
2. **Per-referee sections.** Restate every comment (verbatim or faithfully numbered), then respond.
Back to top