Individual skill
socc-review-process
Use when reasoning about how an ACM SoCC submission is evaluated, covering dual-anonymous review, the two-round-per-year model with the no-cross-round-resubmission rule, the author-response (rebuttal) period, the joint SIGMOD+SIGOPS reviewer pool that reads for both systems and data quality, and how SoCC's process differs from OSDI/NSDI/EuroSys.
SoCC-Skills/skills/socc-review-process/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,405
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- operations Derived category
- data Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 6,362 bytes
Read excerpt
# SoCC Review Process
Model the pipeline before interpreting any single review. SoCC — the ACM Symposium on Cloud
Computing — evaluates papers through a **dual-anonymous, two-round** process with a **rebuttal**,
and its reviewer pool is drawn from **both SIGMOD and SIGOPS**. The most consequential mental shift
for authors arriving from a pure systems or pure data venue is that your paper is judged on **both**
axes at once: a systems reviewer probes the mechanism and the deployment, a data/measurement
reviewer probes the workloads, traces, and statistical honesty — and a champion needs answers for
both.
## Process model
- Submission and review run on **HotCRP** with **dual anonymity**: reviewers do not see authors and
authors do not see reviewers.