Individual skill
atc-supplementary
Use when deciding what belongs in the ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) two-page extended abstract, the 12-page paper body, the optional appendix, and the artifact — splitting content by review round and decision-criticality so nothing that decides acceptance lives where a reviewer is not required to read.
ATC-Skills/skills/atc-supplementary/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,405
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- writing Derived category
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 4,565 bytes
Read excerpt
# ATC Supplementary
ATC gives you four places to put content, each read by a different reviewer under a different rule:
the **two-page extended abstract** (round one, two reviewers), the **12-page body** (round two, 3-4
reviewers), the **appendix** (optional reading), and the **artifact** (opened during round two and
evaluated post-acceptance). Placing content correctly is a strategic decision, not a formatting one,
because reviewers are **not required** to read the appendix and a round-one reviewer may read **only**
the abstract.
## The placement rule
**Anything that decides acceptance goes in a place the deciding reviewer is required to read.**
- Round-one acceptance is decided from the **extended abstract** → the problem, contribution,