Individual skill
itcs-reproducibility
Use to make an ITCS paper's mathematics independently checkable — complete proofs of every central claim, self-contained definitions, pinned dependencies on prior results, and a matching full version on arXiv/ECCC/ePrint — the pure-theory analogue of a reproducibility package.
ITCS-Skills/skills/itcs-reproducibility/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,411
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 5,722 bytes
Read excerpt
# ITCS Reproducibility
"Reproducibility" at a pure-theory venue means one thing: **a competent, skeptical reader can
verify every central claim from the paper alone.** There is no code to rerun and no dataset to
re-mine — the analogue of a reproducibility package is a **complete, self-contained, correctly
attributed proof**. ITCS makes this concrete in its call: submissions must include **complete
proofs of all central claims** (in an appendix if needed). This skill is the discipline that
makes the mathematics checkable, which — since ITCS has **no rebuttal** — is also your only
defense against a reviewer who gets stuck.
## Completeness: every central claim is fully proved
- **No "proof omitted," no "proof is standard," no "see the full version"** for anything a
reviewer must check to believe the result. Deferring a *routine* calculation to an appendix is