Individual skill
mathfin-rebuttal
Use when responding to a Mathematical Finance (Wiley) revise-and-resubmit — triages referee comments on theorem novelty, proof gaps, martingale and integrability conditions, assumption scope, counterexamples, exposition, numerical support, and financial-modelling relevance into a point-by-point letter plus aligned manuscript edits.
Mathematical-Finance-Skills/skills/mathfin-rebuttal/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,409
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- finance Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 5,319 bytes
Read excerpt
# R&R Rebuttal (mathfin-rebuttal)
## When to trigger
- A revision decision arrives from *Mathematical Finance*
- Referees identify proof gaps, unclear assumptions, missing novelty, or weak financial interpretation
- You need a point-by-point response letter and aligned manuscript edits
## Triage categories
1. **Proof correctness**: missing lemma, invalid theorem application, local/true
martingale issue, integrability, measurability, boundary condition.
2. **Assumption scope**: too strong, too weak, unstated, or not financially interpretable.
3. **Novelty**: overlap with prior theorem, special-case concern, missing citation.