Individual skill
cscw-review-process
Use when interpreting where a CSCW paper stands in review — the PACMHCI journal model's decision vocabulary (Revise for External Review, Revise and Resubmit, Conditional Accept), same-reviewer re-review, the rolling editorial board, and what each outcome statistically implied in the last cycle.
CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-review-process/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,405
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- operations Derived category
- writing Derived category
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 4,543 bytes
Read excerpt
# CSCW Review Process
CSCW reviews papers the way a journal does, wearing a conference's name. Decisions
come in revision vocabulary, revised papers return to the **same reviewers**, and —
under the rolling model launched for CSCW 2027+ — the process is run by an
**editorial board** (Editors-in-Chief Amy Bruckman and Eric Gilbert, with handling
editors per methodological track) rather than a per-year program committee. Reading
the process correctly changes how you write, revise, and wait.
## The decision ladder (2026-cycle vocabulary)
| Decision | What it means | What it asks of you |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Revise for External Review | Screeners saw promise but flaws worth fixing *before* reviewers are spent on it | A focused repair on a short clock; treat as a free pre-review |