Individual skill
naacl-artifact-evaluation
Use when packaging datasets, models, prompts, or annotation materials for a NAACL-bound submission — building the artifact around the Responsible NLP checklist's artifact questions, documenting provenance and licensing for language data, and handling community-owned or Indigenous-language resources correctly.
NAACL-Skills/skills/naacl-artifact-evaluation/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,405
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- data Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 5,926 bytes
Read excerpt
# NAACL Artifact Evaluation
NAACL has no separate artifact-badging track; artifacts are judged inside
the ARR review itself, through the supplement upload and section B of the
Responsible NLP checklist ("scientific artifacts"). That placement matters:
your artifact documentation is not an optional extra but a set of sworn
answers reviewers cross-examine against the PDF.
## What the artifact must let a reviewer do
- **Trace provenance.** Where did every corpus come from, under what
license, and does your use match the terms and the creators' intent?
- **Inspect the instrument.** Prompts, annotation guidelines, interface
screenshots, and pay rates are artifacts too — a human-evaluation claim