Individual skill

cav-related-work

Use when positioning a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) submission against the verification literature across CAV, TACAS, FMCAD, VMCAI, POPL/PLDI, and the journals (FMSD, JAR, TOCL, STTT), writing delta-first contrast rather than a citation catalog, crediting the right benchmark and tool lineages, keeping self-citations double-anonymous for the anonymized categories, and handling concurrent and prior-version overlap.

CAV-Skills/skills/cav-related-work/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,404
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# CAV Related Work

Use this to audit novelty and eligibility. CAV reviewers are close to the verification literature and
expect to see where your paper sits relative to the nearest prior technique or tool — stated as a
**delta**, not a list. Reopen the current CFP for dual-submission, anonymity, and prior-publication
rules before advising authors.

## Positioning checks

- **Separate the verification novelty from the engineering effort.** What is new: an algorithm, a
  decision procedure, an abstraction, a soundness result, a tool capability, or a benchmark regime
  nobody had covered?
- **Cover the verification lanes.** CAV reviewers expect the flagship venues, the tool ecosystems,
  and the journals — not just the papers nearest your method (see the table). A bibliography missing
Back to top