Individual skill
newms-rebuttal
Use when responding to a New Media & Society (NM&S) revise-and-resubmit decision — building a point-by-point response letter to multiple interdisciplinary reviewers plus the editor. Structures the response; it does not fabricate new results.
New-Media-and-Society-Skills/skills/newms-rebuttal/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,401
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 4,761 bytes
Read excerpt
# Rebuttal & R&R Strategy (newms-rebuttal)
A major revision at NM&S is an invitation, not a rejection — but it must be earned with a disciplined,
point-by-point response to an **interdisciplinary** set of reviewers whose objections often pull in
different directions. The letter is as important as the revision: it shows the editor you took every
reviewer seriously and resolved (or reasonably contested) each point.
## When to trigger
- You received a major/minor revision (or a reject-with-encouragement) decision
- You need to structure the response letter and the revision plan
- Reviewers disagree with each other and you must reconcile their demands
## Response-letter structure