Individual skill
icdt-author-response
Use when responding to ICDT (International Conference on Database Theory) referees — principally the first-cycle Revise-and-resubmit round, where you return a corrected paper that closes each identified proof gap, plus any short author-comment phase, keeping the response anonymous and mapping every referee point to a concrete change in the revised PDF.
ICDT-Skills/skills/icdt-author-response/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,400
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- data Derived category
- research Derived category
- data-databases Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 4,780 bytes
Read excerpt
# ICDT Author Response
Write the response for a venue where the referees **checked your proofs**. ICDT's central
author-interaction mechanism is the **Cycle-1 Revise-and-resubmit**: not a short rebuttal that
argues taste, but a returned paper in which each gap the referees named has been *closed* and the
change documented. The second read is done by the same referees; a point raised and not addressed is
what turns a revision into a reject.
> Confirm the exact interaction model for the live cycle: ICDT's primary lever is the revision;
> whether a separate short rebuttal/author-comment phase runs in a given edition is **待核实** —
> read the current call. The advice below applies to the revision and, where one exists, to a brief
> comment phase.
## Triage the referee points first