Individual skill
cvpr-artifact-evaluation
Use when packaging code, models, datasets, or demo videos for a CVPR paper at either review time or release time, covering anonymous supplement packaging under the external-link ban, the dataset-release-by-camera-ready rule, model-weight and license decisions, and making a vision artifact runnable by a skeptical stranger.
CVPR-Skills/skills/cvpr-artifact-evaluation/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,405
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 6,791 bytes
Read excerpt
# CVPR Artifact Evaluation
CVPR has no badge-granting artifact committee; the "evaluation" of your artifacts is
done informally, twice, by two different audiences. At review time, reviewers poke at an
anonymous supplement while deciding whether to trust your tables. After acceptance, the
entire field — 2026 drew 44,011 authors alone — decides whether your method becomes a
baseline or a citation nobody reproduces. Package for both audiences deliberately.
## Review-time artifacts: sealed-box rules
Everything must ride inside the uploaded supplement, because the 2026-verified policy
bans external links that expand content or subvert review. That kills the usual
anonymous-repo-link workflow many venues tolerate. Practical consequences:
