Individual skill

jle-referee-strategy

Use when anticipating the objections a law-and-economics referee at The Journal of Law and Economics (JLE) will raise, so a manuscript pre-empts them before submission or addresses them in revision. Plans the defense around JLE's single-blind process; it does not draft the response letter (jle-rebuttal) or run the submission preflight (jle-submission).

Journal-of-Law-and-Economics-Skills/skills/jle-referee-strategy/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,411
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Referee Strategy (jle-referee-strategy)

## When to trigger

- The paper is near submission and you want to stress-test it against the referees it will draw
- You need to decide which robustness/legal-design checks to run *before* submitting vs. hold in reserve
- An R&R arrived and you must map referee concerns to concrete responses
- You want to understand how JLE's single-blind process shapes strategy

## How JLE review works (plan around it)

JLE uses **single-blind review**: the **authors' identities are visible to referees** (the title page carries your name), while referees stay anonymous (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准). This changes strategy in two ways. First, **do not anonymize the manuscript** — that is the AEJ/JLEO reflex, not JLE; the title page should name you. Second, because referees know who you are, your **track record and your self-citations are visible**, so positioning honestly and not over-claiming matters more, not less. Referees here are **economists who also know the legal institution**; the modal report attacks (1) whether the institution is described correctly and the rule really binds, (2) the credibility of the legal identification, then (3) magnitude/mechanism and external validity across jurisdictions. Pre-empt the predictable objections in the paper itself.

## The objection map (pre-empt in the paper)
Back to top