Individual skill
cscw-reproducibility
Use when strengthening the transparency of a CSCW paper — auditable qualitative analysis trails, documented trace pipelines, codebooks and instruments, and honest data-availability statements when community and participant data cannot ethically be shared.
CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-reproducibility/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,403
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- data Derived category
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 4,903 bytes
Read excerpt
# CSCW Reproducibility and Transparency
Reproducibility at CSCW cannot mean "rerun my script, get my table" — most of the
venue's evidence is people, and much of it must never leave the research team. The
venue's real standard is **auditability**: a skeptical reader should be able to see
how you got from data to claims, and to *build on* the work, even where they cannot
re-execute it. Different strands of a paper owe different transparency debts.
## What each strand owes
| Evidence strand | Shareable | Auditable instead of shareable |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Interviews / fieldwork | Interview guide, recruitment text, codebook with definitions and example (paraphrased) excerpts | The analysis trail: coding approach, memo practice, how disagreements were resolved, how themes stabilized |
| Trace / log analysis | Pipeline code, query definitions, aggregated datasets, synthetic samples | Exact API/version/date of collection; filtering decisions with counts at each step; bot/deletion handling |