Individual skill
arsoc-writing-style
Use when revising an Annual Review of Sociology (ARSoc) review for the ARSoc voice — authoritative, accessible to sociologists outside the subfield, signposted, with a strong opening and a forward-looking research-agenda close, and a survey-style abstract. Polishes prose and structure; it does not design the framework (arsoc-organizing-framework) or audit balance (arsoc-comprehensiveness-and-balance).
Annual-Review-of-Sociology-Skills/skills/arsoc-writing-style/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,405
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- design Derived category
- writing Derived category
- security Derived category
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 6,311 bytes
Read excerpt
# ARSoc Writing Style — the Review Voice (arsoc-writing-style)
## When to trigger
- The framework and coverage are settled and it is time to make the review *read* well
- A sociologist from an adjacent subfield would get lost or bored in the current draft
- The opening buries the subfield's importance under jargon or throat-clearing
- The abstract reads like a paper abstract ("we find…") rather than a review abstract
- The close trails off into "more research is needed" instead of a concrete agenda
## The ARSoc voice: authoritative + accessible + forward-looking
An ARSoc review is read by **sociologists outside the subfield** — smart, but not specialists here. The voice is a trusted, fair expert teaching the area to a colleague from another part of the discipline. Four qualities define it:
