Individual skill
infocom-review-process
Use when reasoning about how an IEEE INFOCOM submission is evaluated, covering the large-scale double-blind pipeline, automated paper-reviewer assignment, the two-tier TPC and early-reject phase, the (traditional) absence of an author rebuttal, TPC discussion, and how INFOCOM's process differs from SIGCOMM/NSDI rebuttal-driven reviewing.
INFOCOM-Skills/skills/infocom-review-process/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,405
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- operations Derived category
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 5,940 bytes
Read excerpt
# INFOCOM Review Process
Model the pipeline before interpreting any single review. INFOCOM's process is **large-scale and
TPC-driven**: thousands of submissions are matched to a broad Technical Program Committee by an
**automated assignment system**, screened through an **early-reject** phase, and decided in TPC
discussion. The most consequential mental shift for authors arriving from SIGCOMM/NSDI is that
INFOCOM has **traditionally offered no author rebuttal** — the submitted PDF must defend itself,
because you likely never get a turn to reply.
## Process model
- Submission and review run on **EDAS** with **double-blind** anonymity: identities are hidden from
reviewers throughout.
- **Automated review assignment** matches each manuscript to TPC members by comparing the paper's