Individual skill
advmat-referee-strategy
Use when choosing suggested and opposed referees for an Advanced Materials submission and pre-empting the objections materials reviewers most often raise. Plans referee selection and objection defense; does not write the manuscript or the rebuttal.
Advanced-Materials-Skills/skills/advmat-referee-strategy/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,411
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 5,240 bytes
Read excerpt
# Advanced Materials Referee Strategy (advmat-referee-strategy)
## When to trigger
- The submission form asks for suggested and opposed referees and you have not planned them
- You want to pre-empt the objections a materials reviewer will raise before they raise them
- You are unsure who can judge both the *novelty* and the *characterization rigor* of the work
- A prior submission was rejected on a predictable objection you could have addressed
## Who should judge an Adv. Mater. paper
Adv. Mater. work sits at the intersection of synthesis/characterization and function/device. A good referee set covers **both** competences, plus the breadth the gate demands:
- **A synthesis/characterization expert** — can assess whether the structure/phase/composition claims are proven by the technique set.