Menu

Individual skill

jme-review-process

0upvotes

Use when you need to understand how the Journal of Monetary Economics (JME) review process actually works — single anonymized (single-blind) review with at least two reviewers, the distinctive "up or out" first-revision rule, the ~50% publication-likelihood threshold for an R&R, suggested referees, and reconsideration.

Journal-of-Monetary-Economics-Skills/skills/jme-review-process/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,404
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Review Process (jme-review-process)

## When to trigger

- You need to set expectations for what happens after submission
- You are unsure what "up or out" means for your revision strategy
- You want to know whether to suggest referees or request exclusions
- A decision arrived and you need to interpret it

## How JME review works

- **Single anonymized (single-blind) review**: reviewers know the author identities; **authors do not know the reviewers.** Plan your framing and self-citation accordingly — there is no point anonymizing the manuscript.
- **At least two reviewers**: suitable submissions are typically sent to a **minimum of two reviewers.**
- **Editors**: the journal is led by two **co-Editors-in-Chief**, **S. Borağan Aruoba (University of Maryland)** and **Eric Swanson (University of California, Irvine)** (Aruoba appointed as one of the two Editors-in-Chief effective January 1, 2022); neither outranks the other.
Back to top