Menu

Individual skill

jet-review-process

0upvotes

Use when interpreting the Journal of Economic Theory (JET) review pipeline — editor desk-screening, single-anonymized refereeing, at least two reviewers, editor decisions, and the generative-AI bar on referees.

Journal-of-Economic-Theory-Skills/skills/jet-review-process/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,405
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Review Process (jet-review-process)

## When to trigger

- You want to understand how JET evaluates a theory submission before sending it
- You are deciding how defensively to write proofs and which objections to pre-empt
- You received a decision and want to read it against JET's actual process

## How JET evaluates (verified 2026-06-20)

- **Two-stage flow.** Editors first assess **suitability** (a desk-screen / desk-rejection stage);
  papers that pass are sent out for refereeing.
- **Single anonymized review (single-blind).** Referees see author identities; authors do not see
  referee identities. This differs from QJE/AEA-style double-blind — so **do not** rely on
Back to top