Individual skill
ier-literature-positioning
Use when staking an International Economic Review (IER) manuscript's contribution against the frontier and against sibling journals (Econometrica/QE, the top-5, field journals). Sharpens the gap and the delta; it does not invent citations.
International-Economic-Review-Skills/skills/ier-literature-positioning/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,411
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 8,546 bytes
Read excerpt
# Literature Positioning (ier-literature-positioning)
## When to trigger
- The intro lists prior work but never says what *this* paper adds that none of them did
- A coauthor cannot state, in one sentence, the delta over the single closest paper
- The draft reads like a strong field-journal paper and you need the general-interest claim to be legible
- You are unsure how to position against the obvious sibling (Econometrica/QE) so the desk editor sees why it is here, not there
## The IER positioning logic
At IER the contribution is almost always **methodological or model-level generality**, so positioning is not "we study X in a new setting" — it is "the existing tool/result fails or is silent *here*, and ours is the first that is both correct and general." Build the position in three layers, from frontier down to the load-bearing delta:
1. **Frontier statement.** Name the 3–6 papers that define the current best answer. For a structural paper, name the canonical model you generalize or discipline; for a method paper, name the incumbent estimator; for theory, name the result you sharpen or overturn.