Menu

Individual skill

jru-rebuttal

0upvotes

Use when a Journal of Risk and Uncertainty (JRU) decision letter has arrived and you need a response-letter strategy. Triages referee reports into a revision plan and reply; it does not invent evidence or citations.

Journal-of-Risk-and-Uncertainty-Skills/skills/jru-rebuttal/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,404
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Rebuttal Strategy (jru-rebuttal)

## When to trigger

- A JRU decision arrived (R&R, major/minor revision, or reject-and-resubmit) and the team needs a response plan
- Referees disagree — one wants more theory, another wants more robustness — and you must reconcile them
- A report rests on a misreading and you must correct it without sounding defensive
- A requested analysis (a new elicitation, a robustness re-estimate) is large and you must scope what is feasible

## How JRU decisions work and how to read them

JRU's referees are specialists, so a report usually contains a few **deep, technical** objections rather than many shallow ones — and the editor (W. Kip Viscusi) weights the substantive decision-theoretic or measurement concerns heavily. Triage before drafting:

| Comment type | Response move |
Back to top