Individual skill
cvpr-reproducibility
Use when hardening a CVPR paper's reproducibility story, covering the Compute Reporting Form's hardware and compute sections, training-recipe disclosure, benchmark protocol and split hygiene, seed and variance reporting for vision experiments, and closing the gaps reviewers probe at a benchmark-driven venue.
CVPR-Skills/skills/cvpr-reproducibility/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,411
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 6,527 bytes
Read excerpt
# CVPR Reproducibility
At CVPR, reproducibility failures rarely look like fraud; they look like a table nobody
can match because one augmentation flag, one crop size, or one pretraining corpus went
unstated. This skill hardens the paper against that fate, anchored in the 2026-cycle
machinery (checked 2026-07-08): the Compute Reporting Form, the anonymous supplement,
and reviewers trained on a decade of un-reproducible state-of-the-art claims.
## The CRF as a reproducibility floor
The 2026 cycle attached a Compute Reporting Form to every submission — Section 1
(hardware specification) and Section 5 (verification) mandatory, deeper sections
optional, with an explicit opt-out route for proprietary constraints. Treat the
mandatory floor as the start, not the ceiling: