Individual skill

jeg-contribution-framing

Use when articulating the marginal contribution of a manuscript to the Journal of Economic Growth (JEG) — sharpening what the paper adds to economic-growth knowledge, calibrated to a specialist Springer Nature theory-and-empirics outlet. Turns "a paper about X" into "the first result that Y."

Journal-of-Economic-Growth-Skills/skills/jeg-contribution-framing/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,405
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Contribution Framing (jeg-contribution-framing)

## When to trigger

- The introduction explains what you did but not why it matters for growth
- You cannot state the contribution in one sentence without hedging
- A co-author asks "what's the one thing a reader remembers?"

## The JEG contribution bar

JEG is a specialist outlet, so the contribution must be a genuine advance **in understanding growth or dynamic-macro dynamics**, not a technique demonstration or a within-field estimate that mentions growth. The journal values both:

- **Theoretical contributions** — a new mechanism, a more general result, a unification of mechanisms, a resolution of a tension in existing growth models, or a tractable model that delivers a sharp, testable growth prediction.
- **Empirical contributions** — credible evidence on a growth-relevant causal channel, a new long-run or cross-country dataset that resolves a measurement gap, or a test that discriminates between competing growth theories.
Back to top