Menu

Individual skill

joe-literature-positioning

0upvotes

Use when the contribution of a Journal of Econometrics (JoE) manuscript relative to the econometrics literature is fuzzy or undersold. Locates the paper precisely against the nearest estimators, tests, and asymptotic results so referees see the methodological delta.

Journal-of-Econometrics-Skills/skills/joe-literature-positioning/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,400
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Literature Positioning (joe-literature-positioning)

## When to trigger

- A referee could ask "how is this different from [known estimator/test]?" and you lack a crisp answer
- The related-work section lists papers but never states the precise gap
- You cannot name the single closest prior method and the exact dimension on which you improve
- Reviewers might think the result is a special case of something already published

## Why positioning is decisive at JoE

The *Journal of Econometrics* judges a paper first on its **methodological novelty and rigor**. Editors screen submissions before sending suitable papers to a **minimum of two independent referees** (single-anonymized review), and these referees are typically specialists who know the nearest competing methods cold. A manuscript that does not locate itself precisely against the frontier reads as either redundant or unaware — both are desk- or referee-level rejections. Positioning is not a literature dump; it is an argument that a specific gap exists and that you close it.

## Positioning moves specific to econometric methodology
Back to top