Individual skill
aamas-writing-style
Use when revising an AAMAS paper so the interaction contribution leads the first page, the solution concept or incentive property is named, the game and agents are legible, claims are paired with proofs or multiagent experiments, the argument fits eight two-column pages plus references, and the wording stays double-blind.
AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-writing-style/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,405
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- writing Derived category
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 3,490 bytes
Read excerpt
# AAMAS Writing Style
Use this when revising the main paper. AAMAS papers need a compact statement of why an
*interaction* result matters and enough detail for a game theorist and an empiricist to both
validate it.
## Revision rules
- Put the interaction contribution on the first page: the multiagent problem, why single-agent
or centralized fixes fail, the mechanism or learning rule, the strategic property, and the
evidence.
- Name the solution concept or incentive property (Nash, correlated, coarse-correlated,
no-regret, dominant-strategy truthful, Pareto); an unnamed "equilibrium" is a review flag.
- Make the game legible: agents, actions, information structure, and payoffs stated once and