Individual skill
sosp-related-work
Use when positioning a SOSP submission against the systems literature — the SOSP/OSDI lineage a PC expects you to know, structural comparison instead of citation listing, third-person self-citation under double-blind rules, and handling concurrent work across the now-annual systems deadline circuit.
SOSP-Skills/skills/sosp-related-work/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,405
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 5,299 bytes
Read excerpt
# SOSP Related Work
Use this when writing or auditing the related-work section of a SOSP paper. At this
venue the section is a load-bearing wall: the PC contains authors of the systems you
must compare against, the meeting will replay any positioning gap out loud, and the
"how does this differ from X" review is the most common avoidable negative. Rules
below reflect the 2026-cycle CFP's double-blind policy (checked 2026-07-08).
## Know the lineage or be corrected in public
A SOSP reviewer expects the paper to place itself in the SOSP/OSDI line of work on
its problem — often decades deep — plus the adjacent venues where the problem also
lives (EuroSys, USENIX ATC, NSDI for networked systems, FAST for storage, ASPLOS at
the architecture boundary). Two search passes are mandatory before the freeze: