Individual skill
nbr-discussion-contribution
Use to write the discussion section for 《南开管理评论》 (Nankai Business Review) so it loops back to the introduction's gap and advances a management theory — extension, boundary condition, or integration — rather than restating results. Use when the discussion only summarizes findings, or when the theoretical-contribution paragraph repeats the hypotheses without saying what changed in the theory.
Nankai-Business-Review-Skills/skills/nbr-discussion-contribution/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,400
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 4,883 bytes
Read excerpt
# 讨论与理论贡献(nbr-discussion-contribution)
## 触发时机
- 讨论部分只复述"H1 成立、H2 成立"
- "理论贡献"段落把假设又抄一遍,没说推进了什么
- 引言立的缺口,讨论里没有回扣闭环
## 讨论应回答的三件事
1. **回扣缺口**:引言说某理论欠什么,本文结果如何填补
2. **推进理论**:用一种明确方式推进——
- **扩展(extension)**:把理论延伸到新构念/新机制/新层级
- **边界条件(boundary)**:指明理论在何种情境/水平下成立、削弱或反转