Individual skill

mind-review-process

Use to understand how Mind evaluates a submission — triple-anonymous peer review, quality as the sole criterion, the role of expert referees, and what it means for a journal that receives over 800 submissions a year. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.

Mind-Skills/skills/mind-review-process/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,411
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Review Process (mind-review-process)

Knowing how Mind screens and decides lets you pre-empt the failure modes before submitting. Mind runs a
**triple-anonymous** process, takes **quality as the sole criterion**, and receives **over 800
submissions a year** judged by expert referees. The selection is severe; the paper must be decisive on
its own terms.

## When to trigger

- Before submitting, to stress-test against the way Mind judges papers
- Interpreting a decision letter and setting realistic expectations
- Understanding why anonymization is non-negotiable here
- Deciding whether your piece is competitive at a high-rejection venue
Back to top