Individual skill
finman-writing-style
Use when the prose, abstract, or introduction of a Financial Management (FM) manuscript buries the idea or its managerial/market payoff — FM's brand is "articles people actually read." Shapes exposition for a general finance audience; it does not establish results (finman-identification) or run the submission preflight (finman-submission).
Financial-Management-Skills/skills/finman-writing-style/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,411
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- writing Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 8,079 bytes
Read excerpt
# Writing Style (finman-writing-style)
## When to trigger
- The abstract and intro state what was done but not why a finance reader (or a practitioner) should care
- The paper reads like a technical report — correct, dense, and unread
- The contribution is buried under literature review or methodology before the finding appears
- You are doing the final exposition pass before submission (do this *after* the evidence settles)
## The FM writing bar
FM is unusually explicit that it wants **"a finance journal that publishes academic articles that people actually read."** That is a writing standard, not a slogan. The exposition is judged on whether a **general finance audience** — not just the immediate subfield — grasps the question, the answer, and the **practical relevance** quickly, and whether the paper **provokes and furthers debate.** Concretely: the abstract and first page must deliver the finding and its managerial/market implication before any apparatus; jargon that only insiders parse is a cost; and the "so-what for managers, investors, or regulators" must be stated, not left for the reader to infer. This is the lane that separates FM from siblings whose house voice tolerates a denser, more specialist register.
## The exposition build (in order)