Menu

Individual skill

etp-review-process

0upvotes

Use when calibrating expectations for the Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP) review cycle — desk-reject odds, the developmental double-anonymized review, R&R norms, and revision choreography.

Entrepreneurship-Theory-and-Practice-Skills/skills/etp-review-process/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,405
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Review Process (etp-review-process)

## When to trigger

- You just submitted and want to know what to expect and when
- A decision letter arrived and you need to read the signal (reject / major R&R / minor)
- You are deciding whether an R&R is winnable and how much to invest
- You want to understand ETP's developmental review culture before you respond
- You are weighing a resubmission to ETP vs. a reroute to JBV/SEJ/AMJ

## How ETP review actually runs

ETP uses **double-anonymized peer review** through ScholarOne, typically with a handling/associate editor and **two to three reviewers**.
Like its top management/entrepreneurship peers, ETP runs a **developmental review model**: reviewers and editors aim to help a promising paper become publishable across rounds, so a **major R&R is the realistic "good" first outcome** for a strong submission — outright first-round acceptance is rare.
Back to top