Individual skill
etp-rebuttal
Use when drafting the response to an Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP) R&R — building a point-by-point response letter that honors the developmental, double-anonymized review and re-secures the theory-and-practice contribution.
Entrepreneurship-Theory-and-Practice-Skills/skills/etp-rebuttal/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,404
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 7,194 bytes
Read excerpt
# Rebuttal Strategy (etp-rebuttal)
## When to trigger
- An ETP major or minor R&R arrived and you must draft the response
- Reviewers disagree and you need a strategy that does not whipsaw the paper
- A reviewer asks for analysis or theory you are unsure you should provide
- The theory contribution or the practice mandate took fire and must be re-secured
- You need a response-letter structure an editor and reviewers will find easy to verify
## The ETP rebuttal mindset
ETP's review is **developmental** — an R&R is an invitation, and the editor and reviewers have invested in the paper's improvement.
The winning posture is **gracious, thorough, and responsive**: take every point seriously, do the work where it is reasonable, and disagree only with evidence and a clear rationale.