Individual skill
humrel-data-analysis
Use when executing and reporting the analysis for a Human Relations (HR) manuscript — qualitative coding and data-to-theory construction, critical interpretation, or quantitative estimation and robustness. Makes the evidence-to-theory link transparent; it does not design the study (see humrel-methods).
Human-Relations-Skills/skills/humrel-data-analysis/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,397
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
- design Derived category
- data Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 6,541 bytes
Read excerpt
# Data Analysis & Evidence (humrel-data-analysis)
## When to trigger
- You have data but the path from data to theory is opaque
- Qualitative: quotes are decorative, not evidentiary; coding is undocumented
- Critical: the interpretation reads as assertion rather than disciplined reading of the material
- Quantitative: main results exist but theorizing stops at the coefficient
- A reviewer asks "how did you get from your data to these constructs?"
## The HR bar: make the inference auditable, then theorize beyond it
HR judges each tradition on its own terms, but every branch must satisfy the same demand: a reader should be able to *see how the evidence became theory*, and the analysis must yield the "unique and substantive theoretical contribution" the journal screens for. The relational, social nature of work should remain visible in the analysis — not abstracted away into variables or quotations stripped of context.
