Individual skill
arsoc-workflow
Use when deciding which arsoc-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing an invited review article from topic through revision for an Annual Review of Sociology (ARSoc) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
Annual-Review-of-Sociology-Skills/skills/arsoc-workflow/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,404
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- operations Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 7,272 bytes
Read excerpt
# ARSoc Workflow Router (arsoc-workflow)
## Overview
This is the router. It tells you **which arsoc-* skill to use at the current stage** of an **invited review article** aimed at the *Annual Review of Sociology* (ARSoc) — the **Annual Reviews** (nonprofit) sociology survey series, founded **1975**, published as an **annual volume** with the discipline's highest impact factor (检索于 2026-06;2024 JIF ≈ 9, ranked 1st of 219 in Sociology;以官网为准). ARSoc does **not** publish original empirical research. It publishes **authoritative, accessible review articles** that synthesize a sociology subfield — stratification, culture, organizations, networks, race/ethnicity, gender, demography, political and economic sociology — for sociologists across the discipline. So the lifecycle is not "design → identify → estimate → defend"; it is **scope a synthesis-worthy subfield → secure the commission → read the whole literature → impose an organizing framework → cover comprehensively and even-handedly → land the ARSoc voice → clear the Annual Reviews process → revise.**
Default assumption: unless the user says otherwise, treat the target as ARSoc and the artefact as an **invited review**, not a primary-research paper. Operational tells that you are at ARSoc and not a sibling: the work **reviews other scholars' results** rather than reporting its own; **unsolicited finished manuscripts are not accepted** — the **Editorial Committee commissions** topics and authors (you can suggest a topic, but you cannot self-submit a finished paper the way you would to ASR or AJS) (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准); there is **no identification strategy and no replication package of your own data** (you appraise the studies you cover); the contribution is an **analytical map of a subfield** ending in a research agenda, not a new finding. If the user actually has original data and results, they want a primary-research journal (ASR, AJS, *Sociological Science*, *Demography*), not ARSoc — say so.
## When to trigger
- The user asks "what should I do next?" on an invited review
- A review draft reads like an annotated bibliography and needs a spine
- Work is ping-ponging between coverage, framing, balance, and the topic pitch
- An ARSoc editor/Committee letter arrived and the user needs to switch into revision mode