Individual skill
cjms-empirical-validation
Use when designing the real-data validation of a 《中国管理科学》 (Chinese Journal of Management Science) manuscript — forecasting and financial-engineering strands: data provenance, rolling out-of-sample tests, benchmark batteries, and significance of improvement. Validates methods on data; simulation-based studies belong to cjms-numerical-experiments.
Chinese-Journal-of-Management-Science-Skills/skills/cjms-empirical-validation/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,410
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 6,354 bytes
Read excerpt
# 实证与数据检验(cjms-empirical-validation)
## 触发时机
- 预测/金融类稿件只有全样本内拟合,没有样本外
- "新方法更优"只凭一张误差表,没有显著性检验
- 数据来源、频率、区间交代不清,无法复现
## 核心:本刊实证的四道硬门
预测与决策、市场与投资分析两个栏目的稿件,外审按四道门检查:
1. **数据可溯源**:来源(Wind/CSMAR/交易所官网/公开能源数据)、频率、起止区间、缺失处理逐项写明;关键序列给描述统计与平稳性检验。
2. **样本外为王**:训练/验证/测试切分或滚动窗口预先声明;窗口长度、步长、再估计频率写清。样本内 R² 再高也不算证据。