Individual skill

jop-literature-positioning

Use when positioning a The Journal of Politics (JOP) manuscript in the literature — staking a theoretically innovative, general-interest contribution while keeping the manuscript double-blind. JOP's page budget forces an efficient literature section, so engage the debates that matter without a survey. Frames the contribution; it does not write the paper.

Journal-of-Politics-Skills/skills/jop-literature-positioning/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,400
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Literature Positioning (jop-literature-positioning)

JOP rewards a **theoretically innovative** contribution pitched to a **general** political-science
reader. The literature section must earn its space against the **page budget**: engage the debates the
paper actually moves, not a survey — and do it **double-blind**, without outing yourself.

## When to trigger

- Drafting or tightening the framing/literature section
- A reviewer said the contribution is "unclear," "incremental," or "ignores X"
- The literature review is eating too many of your 35 (or 10) pages
- Neutralizing self-citations for double-blind review

## How to position for JOP
Back to top