Individual skill
infocom-writing-style
Use when revising an IEEE INFOCOM paper for a networking problem and system model stated up front, theorems or protocol design that pay off, evaluation proportional to the claim, defensive writing that pre-empts objections (because there is no rebuttal), double-blind wording, and disciplined use of the tight IEEEtran two-column page budget.
INFOCOM-Skills/skills/infocom-writing-style/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,410
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- writing Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 5,565 bytes
Read excerpt
# INFOCOM Writing Style
Use this when revising the main paper. INFOCOM papers are read by a **broad networking TPC** that
spans theory and systems, inside a **nine-page IEEEtran budget** and (traditionally) with **no
rebuttal**. Two constraints follow: the paper must be legible to both an analyst and a systems
reader, and it must **pre-empt the reviewer's objection in the text**, because you will not get to
answer it later.
## Revision rules
- **State the networking problem and the system model first.** By the end of the introduction a
reader should know the setting (topology, traffic, constraints), the gap, the contribution
(analysis and/or design), and what improves. Do not open with a technology-trend paragraph.
- **Make the model do work.** If you formulate an optimization or a Markov/queueing model, its